https://github.com/python/peps/issues/176 is tracking the need to update
the PEP.
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 at 23:45 Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Your assumption is correct. Perhaps the PEP 7 should be partitioned into
> "< 3.6" and "3.6" sections where applicable.
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017, at 12:50, Bre
Your assumption is correct. Perhaps the PEP 7 should be partitioned into
"< 3.6" and "3.6" sections where applicable.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017, at 12:50, Brett Cannon wrote:
> https://bugs.python.org/issue29215 noticed that PEP 7 says "C++-style
> line
> comments" are allowed, but then later says "Neve
https://bugs.python.org/issue29215 noticed that PEP 7 says "C++-style line
comments" are allowed, but then later says "Never use C++ style // one-line
comments." I'm assuming we are sticking with allowing C++-style comments
and the "never" link just needs an addendum to say that only applies to
cod