Yes, please add this to the PEP in the rejected ideas section, with the
motivation for rejection -- the example can show how to work around it.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:51 AM Michael Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:12 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 5:00 PM
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 8:12 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 5:00 PM Michael Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > I've submitted PEP 591 (Adding a final qualifier to typing) for
> discussion to typing-sig [1].
>
> I'm not on typing-sig [1] so I'm replying here.
>
> > Here's the abstract:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 5:00 PM Michael Sullivan wrote:
>
> I've submitted PEP 591 (Adding a final qualifier to typing) for discussion to
> typing-sig [1].
I'm not on typing-sig [1] so I'm replying here.
> Here's the abstract:
> This PEP proposes a "final" qualifier to be added to the ``typing`
I've submitted PEP 591 (Adding a final qualifier to typing) for discussion
to typing-sig [1].
Here's the abstract:
This PEP proposes a "final" qualifier to be added to the ``typing``
module---in the form of a ``final`` decorator and a ``Final`` type
annotation---to serve three related purposes:
*
