On Sep 05 2015, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 5 September 2015 at 12:36, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>>
>> You are giving
>>
>> runcommand(sh(i"cat {filename}"))
>>
>> as an example that avoids injection attacks. While this is true, I think
>> this is still a terrible anti-pattern[1] that shoul
On 5 September 2015 at 12:36, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> You are giving
>
> runcommand(sh(i"cat {filename}"))
>
> as an example that avoids injection attacks. While this is true, I think
> this is still a terrible anti-pattern[1] that should not be entombed in
> a PEP as a positive exam
Hi Nick,
You are giving
runcommand(sh(i"cat {filename}"))
as an example that avoids injection attacks. While this is true, I think
this is still a terrible anti-pattern[1] that should not be entombed in
a PEP as a positive example.
Could you consider removing it?
(It doubly wastes resources
