Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 498: Naming

2015-09-08 Thread Eric V. Smith
On 09/08/2015 10:20 AM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Mike Miller > wrote: > > To my knowledge there was i for interpolation, t for template, and e > for expression suggested. Any better ideas? > > > I believe someone

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 498: Naming

2015-09-08 Thread Alexander Belopolsky
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:37 AM, Mike Miller wrote: > To my knowledge there was i for interpolation, t for template, and e for > expression suggested. Any better ideas? I believe someone suggested !"..." as well. I still think f"..." notation is the best as long as these elements are called "

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 498: Naming

2015-09-08 Thread Mike Miller
Nice work! So we're on the eve of pronouncement and though I've read several bring up the slightly-unfortunate naming of f-strings in the past, I've not seen recent discussion on the subject. While the 498 implementation looks best, it still could be tweaked on the surface to use one of the o