On 18 March 2015 at 06:41, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 16/03/2015 12:38, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>
>
> Can you use anything from the meta issue http://bugs.python.org/issue15787
> for PEP 3121 and PEP 384 or will the work that you are doing render
> everything done previously redundant?
N
On 16/03/2015 12:38, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Hello,
Can you use anything from the meta issue
http://bugs.python.org/issue15787 for PEP 3121 and PEP 384 or will the
work that you are doing render everything done previously redundant?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do fo
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
>
> On 16 March 2015 Petr Viktorin wrote:
>
>> If PyModuleCreate is not defined, PyModuleExec is expected to operate
>> on any Python object for which attributes can be added by PyObject_GetAttr*
>> and retrieved by PyObject_SetAttr*.
>
> I ass
On 16 March 2015 Petr Viktorin wrote:
> If PyModuleCreate is not defined, PyModuleExec is expected to operate
> on any Python object for which attributes can be added by PyObject_GetAttr*
> and retrieved by PyObject_SetAttr*.
I assume it is the other way around (add with Set and retrieve with Ge
Hello,
On import-sig, I've agreed to continue Nick Coghlan's work on making
extension modules act more like Python ones, work well with PEP 451
(ModuleSpec), and encourage proper subinterpreter and reloading support.
Here is the resulting PEP.
I don't have a patch yet, but I'm working on it.
