2013/10/19 Charles-François Natali :
>> get_object_trace(obj) is a shortcut for
>> get_trace(get_object_address(obj)). I agree that the wrong size
>> information can be surprising.
>>
>> I can delete get_object_trace(), or rename the function to
>> get_object_traceback() and modify it to only retur
Let it be known to all that Charles-François Natali is hereby appointed
BDFL for this PEP.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Charles-François Natali <
cf.nat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/10/19 Nick Coghlan :
> >
> > Speaking of which... Charles-François, would you be willing to act as
> > BDFL-Del
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Charles-François Natali <
cf.nat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/10/19 Nick Coghlan :
> >
> > Speaking of which... Charles-François, would you be willing to act as
> > BDFL-Delegate for this PEP? This will be a very useful new analysis tool,
> > and between yourself a
2013/10/19 Nick Coghlan :
>
> Speaking of which... Charles-François, would you be willing to act as
> BDFL-Delegate for this PEP? This will be a very useful new analysis tool,
> and between yourself and Victor it looks like you'll be able to come up with
> a solid API.
>
> I just suggested that app
>>> ``get_tracemalloc_memory()`` function:
>>>
>>> Get the memory usage in bytes of the ``tracemalloc`` module as a
>>> tuple: ``(size: int, free: int)``.
>>>
>>> * *size*: total size of bytes allocated by the module,
>>> including *free* bytes
>>> * *free*: number of free byt
On 19 Oct 2013 03:57, "Charles-François Natali" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm happy to see this move forward!
Speaking of which... Charles-François, would you be willing to act as
BDFL-Delegate for this PEP? This will be a very useful new analysis tool,
and between yourself and Victor it looks like you'
2013/10/18 Charles-François Natali :
> I'm happy to see this move forward!
Thanks for your reviews. I had some time in my train travel to improve
the implementation.
I removed the call to pthread_atfork(): tasks have been removed, it
now makes sense to keep tracemalloc enabled in the child proces
Hi,
I'm happy to see this move forward!
> API
> ===
>
> Main Functions
> --
>
> ``clear_traces()`` function:
>
> Clear traces and statistics on Python memory allocations, and reset
> the ``get_traced_memory()`` counter.
That's nitpicking, but how about just ``reset()`` (I'm p
This looks really nice to me, and splitting it so the core
functionality is in the standard library and there's a separate higher
level tool on PyPI (allowing faster iteration on the analysis
features) is a fine idea.
Cheers,
Nick.
___
Python-Dev mailing
Hi,
I plan to push the new tracemalloc module this week-end, before the
next (and last) alpha version, except if someone complains :-) I
prefer to have one month before the first beta to have more time to
test the module. So if a major issue is raised, we may remove the
tracemalloc module before t
10 matches
Mail list logo
