On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:57:49 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 15 June 2013 03:34, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 09:10:54 -0700
> > Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> >> I (and Guido) are accepting PEP 442 (Safe object finalization) on the
> >> condition that finalizers are only ever called
On 15 June 2013 03:34, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 09:10:54 -0700
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> I (and Guido) are accepting PEP 442 (Safe object finalization) on the
>> condition that finalizers are only ever called once globally.
>
> Ok, so there's an issue with that condition: it
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:34:41 +0200
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 09:10:54 -0700
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> > I (and Guido) are accepting PEP 442 (Safe object finalization) on the
> > condition that finalizers are only ever called once globally.
>
> Ok, so there's an issue with tha
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 09:10:54 -0700
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> I (and Guido) are accepting PEP 442 (Safe object finalization) on the
> condition that finalizers are only ever called once globally.
Ok, so there's an issue with that condition: it can't be upholded on
non-GC objects. Creating a non-GC
Le 05/06/2013 18:10, Benjamin Peterson a écrit :
I (and Guido) are accepting PEP 442 (Safe object finalization) on the
condition that finalizers are only ever called once globally.
Congratulations to Antoine on writing yet another PEP that deeply
touches the core language in a way that everyone
I (and Guido) are accepting PEP 442 (Safe object finalization) on the
condition that finalizers are only ever called once globally.
Congratulations to Antoine on writing yet another PEP that deeply
touches the core language in a way that everyone can agree is an
improvement.. I look forward to rev
