Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 425 comment: package names

2012-10-18 Thread Daniel Holth
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:23 PM, wrote: > > Zitat von Daniel Holth : > > >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:36 PM, wrote: >>> >>> ISTM that some important information and some elaboration is missing from >>> PEP 425. >>> >>> The PEP is currently silent on how exactly these "compatibility tags" are >>

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 425 comment: package names

2012-10-18 Thread martin
Zitat von Daniel Holth : On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:36 PM, wrote: ISTM that some important information and some elaboration is missing from PEP 425. The PEP is currently silent on how exactly these "compatibility tags" are combined with the package name, and the file extension. This should b

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 425 comment: package names

2012-10-18 Thread Daniel Holth
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:36 PM, wrote: > ISTM that some important information and some elaboration is missing from > PEP 425. > > The PEP is currently silent on how exactly these "compatibility tags" are > combined > with the package name, and the file extension. This should be specified, and >

[Python-Dev] PEP 425 comment: package names

2012-10-18 Thread martin
ISTM that some important information and some elaboration is missing from PEP 425. The PEP is currently silent on how exactly these "compatibility tags" are combined with the package name, and the file extension. This should be specified, and preferably some examples be given. Regards, Ma