On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 17:18, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
> Hi,
> 2011/11/9 Barry Warsaw
>>
>> I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and
>> PEPs
>> are as official as it gets 'round here.
>
> Do we need to designate a release manager?
I volunteer. It's on my level of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/2011 07:17 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> Barry Warsaw python.org> writes:
>> On Nov 10, 2011, at 08:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>> Now you need to persuade Vinay to let you trade PEP numbers with the
>>> pyvenv PEP. Having an unrelease schedule
Barry Warsaw python.org> writes:
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 08:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> >Now you need to persuade Vinay to let you trade PEP numbers with the
> >pyvenv PEP. Having an unrelease schedule as PEP 404 is too good an
> >opportunity to pass up :)
>
> Brilliant suggestion! Vinay?
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> Getting boring for a moment, I suggest including the following new
> section just before the copyright section:
I'd also include a "roadmap" section with all 2.x wannabes that are
not going to be be released with 2.8. And a special epilogue
On 10 November 2011 11:05, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 08:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> >Now you need to persuade Vinay to let you trade PEP numbers with the
> >pyvenv PEP. Having an unrelease schedule as PEP 404 is too good an
> >opportunity to pass up :)
>
> Brilliant suggestion!
On 10/11/11 05:18, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
Do we need to designate a release manager?
I nominate John Cleese. Although he's undoubtedly a busy
man, this shouldn't take up too much of his time.
--
Greg
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@pytho
On Nov 10, 2011, at 08:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>Now you need to persuade Vinay to let you trade PEP numbers with the
>pyvenv PEP. Having an unrelease schedule as PEP 404 is too good an
>opportunity to pass up :)
Brilliant suggestion! Vinay? :)
>Getting boring for a moment, I suggest includin
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>+1 for Cardinal Biggles as release manager.
Now you need to persuade Vinay to let you trade PEP numbers with the
pyvenv PEP. Having an unrelease schedule as PEP 404 is too good an
opportunity to pass up :)
Getting boring for a moment, I sugg
On Nov 09, 2011, at 08:58 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>I see why people feel that something more precise and/or formal would
>get the message across better, but the mildly tongue-in-cheek tone
>isn't really inappropriate for a language named after Monty Python :-)
*Thank you* :)
>+1 for Cardinal Biggl
> +1 for Cardinal Biggles as release manager.
+1
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:14, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and
> PEPs
> are as official as it gets 'round here. Thus I propose the following. If
> there are no objections , I'll commit this taking the next available
> number.
+1 on h
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:14, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and PEPs
> are as official as it gets 'round here. Thus I propose the following. If
> there are no objections , I'll commit this taking the next available
> number.
>
> Cheers,
On 11/9/2011 11:14 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8,
http://python.org/download/releases/2.7.2/ (and similar) already say:
The Python 2.7 series is scheduled to be the last major version in the
2.x series before 2.x moves into an extende
On Nov 09, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>I don't know why this PEP is necessary, but I think a more appropriate
>title would be "2.x is in maintenance only mode".
Okay, it's a little tongue-in-cheek, but the practical reason is that I want
it to be the top hit when someone searches
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2011/11/9 Barry Warsaw :
I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and PEPs
are as official as it gets 'round here. Thus I propose the following. If
there are no objections , I'll commit this taking the next available
number.
Cheers,
-Barry
P
On Nov 09, 2011, at 05:18 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
>2011/11/9 Barry Warsaw
>
>> I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and PEPs
>> are as official as it gets 'round here.
>>
>
>Do we need to designate a release manager?
I'd happily serve as the un-release manag
Le Mercredi 9 Novembre 2011 17:18:45 Amaury Forgeot d'Arc a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> 2011/11/9 Barry Warsaw
>
> > I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and
> > PEPs are as official as it gets 'round here.
>
> Do we need to designate a release manager?
random.choice() shou
Hi,
2011/11/9 Barry Warsaw
> I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and PEPs
> are as official as it gets 'round here.
>
Do we need to designate a release manager?
--
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Pytho
2011/11/9 Barry Warsaw :
> I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and PEPs
> are as official as it gets 'round here. Thus I propose the following. If
> there are no objections , I'll commit this taking the next available
> number.
>
> Cheers,
> -Barry
>
> PEP: 405
> Ti
I think we should have an official pronouncement about Python 2.8, and PEPs
are as official as it gets 'round here. Thus I propose the following. If
there are no objections , I'll commit this taking the next available
number.
Cheers,
-Barry
PEP: 405
Title: Python 2.8 Release Schedule
Version: $
20 matches
Mail list logo
