Thank you for sharing your extensive knowledge of these issues, SJT.
On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Zooko O'Whielacronx writes:
>
> > However, it is moot because Tahoe is not a new system. It is
> > currently at v1.4.1, has a strong policy of backwards-
> > compat
Zooko O'Whielacronx writes:
> However, it is moot because Tahoe is not a new system. It is currently
> at v1.4.1, has a strong policy of backwards-compatibility, and already
> has lots of data, lots of users, and programmers building on top of
> it.
Cool!
Question: is there a way to negotiat
