On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
[..]
>
> Since this is done I now approve both PEP 345 and PEP 386 (which is
> not to say that small editorial changes to the text couldn't be made).
Thanks !
Thanks to all the people that helped in those PEPs
Tarek
_
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [..]
>> I have one comment on PEP 345: Why is author-email mandatory? I'm sure
>> there are plenty of cases where either the author doesn't want their
>> email address published, or thei
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
[..]
> I have one comment on PEP 345: Why is author-email mandatory? I'm sure
> there are plenty of cases where either the author doesn't want their
> email address published, or their last know email address is no longer
> valid. (Tarek resp
All,
I've reviewed PEP 345 and PEP 386 and am satisfied that after some
small improvements they will be accepted. Most of the discussion has
already taken place.
I have one comment on PEP 345: Why is author-email mandatory? I'm sure
there are plenty of cases where either the author doesn't want t
