Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [Hey, I thought I sent that just to you. Is python-dev really
> interested in this?]
Force of habit on my part - I saw the python-dev header and automatically
dropped "pyd" into the To: field of the reply.
Given Paul's contribution on the get_data front, it turned out t
On 2/16/06, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/16/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The PEP itself requests that a string be returned from get_data(), but
> > > doesn't
> > > require that the file be opened in
On 2/16/06, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/16/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The PEP itself requests that a string be returned from get_data(), but
> > doesn't
> > require that the file be opened in text mode. Perhaps the PEP 302 emulation
> > should use binar
On 2/16/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Do you have unit tests for everything? I believe I fixed a bug in the
> > code that reads a bytecode file (it wasn't skipping the timestamp).
[Hey, I thought I sent that just to you. Is python-dev really
interested i
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 2/15/06, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> PEP 338 is pretty much ready to go, too - just waiting on Guido's review and
>> pronouncement on the specific API used in the latest update (his last PEP
>> parade said he was OK with the general concept, but I only po
