Am 11.04.2010 00:25, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
> On Apr 10, 2010, at 08:28 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
>>Am 10.04.2010 18:12, schrieb Guido van Rossum:
>>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Apr 09, 2010, at 05:41 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:
On Apr 10, 2010, at 08:28 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>Am 10.04.2010 18:12, schrieb Guido van Rossum:
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> On Apr 09, 2010, at 05:41 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Would it be better t
Am 10.04.2010 18:12, schrieb Guido van Rossum:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Apr 09, 2010, at 05:41 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
Would it be better to name this one _PyImport_ExecCodeModuleExEx (with
a
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 09, 2010, at 05:41 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> Would it be better to name this one _PyImport_ExecCodeModuleExEx (with
>>> an underscore) so that we *don't* need to create an ExE
On Apr 09, 2010, at 05:41 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>> Would it be better to name this one _PyImport_ExecCodeModuleExEx (with
>> an underscore) so that we *don't* need to create an ExExEx version in
>> future? (Sorry, Barry :-))
>
>I don't care
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 9 April 2010 23:00, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> On Apr 09, 2010, at 02:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>>>It may be undocumented but it doesn't start with _ and it exists to
>>>preserve backwards compatibility. So I recommend adding
>>>PyImport_
On 9 April 2010 23:00, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 09, 2010, at 02:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>>It may be undocumented but it doesn't start with _ and it exists to
>>preserve backwards compatibility. So I recommend adding
>>PyImport_ExecCodeModuleExEx().
>
> Cool, thanks. Now I can't wait
On Apr 09, 2010, at 02:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>It may be undocumented but it doesn't start with _ and it exists to
>preserve backwards compatibility. So I recommend adding
>PyImport_ExecCodeModuleExEx().
Cool, thanks. Now I can't wait for PyImport_ExecCodeModuleExExEx() :)
-Barry
sign
It may be undocumented but it doesn't start with _ and it exists to
preserve backwards compatibility. So I recommend adding
PyImport_ExecCodeModuleExEx().
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I've run into a minor snag implementing the __cached__ attribute on imported
> modules.
I've run into a minor snag implementing the __cached__ attribute on imported
modules. From PEP 3147:
As part of this PEP, we will add an `__cached__` attribute to modules,
which will always point to the actual `pyc` file that was read or
written. When the environment variable `$PYTHO
10 matches
Mail list logo