On Fri, 10 May 2013 14:00:09 -0700
Larry Hastings wrote:
>
> I swear I posted a list like this a couple years ago. Now I can't find
> it. Anyway it was completely ignored then, probably because I'm not
> Nick Coghlan.
Many people in the world suffer with this problem.
Regards
Antoine.
__
On 05/10/2013 12:14 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I'd like to mark a few PEPs that are not currently being actively
considered for 3.4 as Deferred:
I swear I posted a list like this a couple years ago. Now I can't find
it. Anyway it was completely ignored then, probably because I'm not
Nick Coghl
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
> You might also ask the authors if they are still really in favor of them or
> have any hope for them, considering whatever discussion occurred, or whether
> they have abandoned them (which would mean withdrawn).
That's real work though, co
On May 10, 2013, at 09:19 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> S 3142 Add a "while" clause to generator expressions Britton
>>
>> I had the impression that this had more or less been rejected. I suppose I
>> could try to dig up the discussion.
>
>I didn't know there was a PEP for that. I
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Terry Jan Reedy wrote:
> On 5/10/2013 3:14 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to mark a few PEPs that are not currently being actively
>> considered for 3.4 as Deferred:
>>
>> S 286 Enhanced Argument Tuplesvon
>> Löwis
>>
On 5/10/2013 3:14 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I'd like to mark a few PEPs that are not currently being actively
considered for 3.4 as Deferred:
S 286 Enhanced Argument Tuplesvon Löwis
S 337 Logging Usage in the Standard Library Dubner
S
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 10, 2013, at 05:14 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> I 396 Module Version Numbers Warsaw
>
> I do want to eventually return to this PEP, but I probably won't any time
> soon.
Yeah, I have a couple of PEP
On May 10, 2013, at 05:14 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I 396 Module Version Numbers Warsaw
I do want to eventually return to this PEP, but I probably won't any time
soon.
-Barry
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@py
Hello Nick,
Le Fri, 10 May 2013 17:14:21 +1000,
Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> I'd like to mark a few PEPs that are not currently being actively
> considered for 3.4 as Deferred:
>
> S 286 Enhanced Argument Tuplesvon
> Löwis S 337 Logging Usage in the Standard
>
I'd like to mark a few PEPs that are not currently being actively
considered for 3.4 as Deferred:
S 286 Enhanced Argument Tuplesvon Löwis
S 337 Logging Usage in the Standard Library Dubner
S 368 Standard image protocol and class
10 matches
Mail list logo
