How is this proposal of di"..." more than a different spelling of lambda
i"..."? (I think it's a great idea — but am wondering if there are some
extra semantics that I missed)
I don't think there's any need to preserve the values of the {...} (or
${...}) constituents — the normal closure mechanism
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:25 PM Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015, 13:51 Peter Ludemann via Python-Dev <
> python-dev@python.org> wrote:
>
> Most of my outputs are log messages, so this proposal won't help me
> because (I presume) it does eager evaluation of the format string and the
> l
