Aahz wrote:
> In all fairness to Tim (and despite the fact that emotionally I agree
> with you), the fact is that there had been essentially no forward motion
> on www.python.org redesign until he went to work. Even if we end up
> chucking out all his work in favor of something else, I'll conside
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Tim Parkin wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>
> no, you're not qualified. yet, someone gave you total control over the
> future of python.org, and there's no way to make you give it up, despite
> the fact that you're over a year late and the stuff you've delivered
