Serhiy Storchaka writes:
> 08.06.13 11:23, Benjamin Peterson написав(ла):
> > 2013/6/8 Serhiy Storchaka :
> >> Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst,
> >> *.txt, *.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile
> >> to update the source code and documentation f
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:51:23 +0300, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> 08.06.13 11:42, M.-A. Lemburg напиÑав(ла):
> > On 08.06.2013 09:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> >> Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
> >> *.py, *.c and *.h files. I
> >> think it would be w
On 2013-06-08 10:59, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
08.06.13 11:23, Benjamin Peterson ... :
2013/6/8 Serhiy Storchaka ... :
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
*.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile to update the
source
code and documentation for mo
By mistake some local files were added to the list. Here's an updated
list. It now also contains low-case references.
Attached also a script used to generate this list.
3: Documentation conventions. (Obsoleted by RFC0010)
Lib/test/math_testcases.txt
10: Documentation conventions. (Obsoleted
08.06.13 11:42, M.-A. Lemburg написав(ла):
On 08.06.2013 09:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt, *.py,
*.c and *.h files. I
think it would be worthwhile to update the source code and documentation for
more modern RFCs.
Thanks for
08.06.13 11:23, Benjamin Peterson написав(ла):
2013/6/8 Serhiy Storchaka :
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
*.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile to update the source
code and documentation for more modern RFCs.
Just because you change t
On 08.06.2013 09:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt, *.py,
> *.c and *.h files. I
> think it would be worthwhile to update the source code and documentation for
> more modern RFCs.
Thanks for creating such a list.
BTW: What is rf
2013/6/8 Serhiy Storchaka :
> Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
> *.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile to update the source
> code and documentation for more modern RFCs.
Just because you change the reference, doesn't mean the code is
automa
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
*.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile to update the
source code and documentation for more modern RFCs.
For example for updating RFC3548 to RFC4648 there is an issue #16995.
821: Simple Mail Transfer Proto
