> Does anyone know if we can force svn to resend the checkin notifications
> for that range? It also looks like r63862 and r63915 are missing. I
> haven't done an exhaustive analysis of what is and isn't present (I also
> don't know if it's normal for revisions to be missing).
I just resent the
Barry Warsaw wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Did some checkin emails get lost yesterday? I didn't see mail for a
checkin of mine, r63895. Looking at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2008-June/date.html,
it l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jun 3, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Eric Smith wrote:
Did some checkin emails get lost yesterday? I didn't see mail for a
checkin of mine, r63895. Looking at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2008-June/date.html
, it looks like r63887-r63
Did some checkin emails get lost yesterday? I didn't see mail for a
checkin of mine, r63895. Looking at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2008-June/date.html, it
looks like r63887-r63898 are missing from the archive, too.
We should probably make an effort to review those check
