On 9/12/07, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I could use a refresher on how PJE's patch solves Andy's problem.
>
> I'm not sure if you're asking about how you would execute a zip file
> after the patch has been applied, or about the mechanics of how the
> patch
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I could use a refresher on how PJE's patch solves Andy's problem.
I'm not sure if you're asking about how you would execute a zip file
after the patch has been applied, or about the mechanics of how the
patch works. PJE's last post covered the former question, so I'll c
At 10:48 AM 9/11/2007 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>I could use a refresher on how PJE's patch solves Andy's problem.
It does the same thing, but with __main__ instead of __zipmain__, and
without needing the -z. So instead of "python -z foo.zip" you can
just do "python foo.zip". This means y
I could use a refresher on how PJE's patch solves Andy's problem.
On 9/11/07, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The local patch I have for PEP 366 is somewhat stale, and before I bring
> it up to date with SVN head, I'd like to close out the issue raised a
> while back regarding making zip
The local patch I have for PEP 366 is somewhat stale, and before I bring
it up to date with SVN head, I'd like to close out the issue raised a
while back regarding making zip files executable [1].
The original proposal was for a new command line switch, but PJE came up
with a patch (attached to
