On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 8 September 2016 at 04:31, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> There's also the issue of starttls, a feature that we know we'd like
>> to add but don't have ready for 3.6b1. I think the right approach
>> there is to provide an add-on package on PyPI
On 8 September 2016 at 04:31, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> There's also the issue of starttls, a feature that we know we'd like
> to add but don't have ready for 3.6b1. I think the right approach
> there is to provide an add-on package on PyPI that implements a
> starttls-capable Transport class, and
PEP 3156 and the asyncio module it defines have been provisional for
the lifetime of Python 3.4 and 3.5. The module is now quite mature. I
propose that we end the provisional period and make asyncio subject to
the usual backwards compatibility rules: new features only appear in
"minor" releases (e.
