Neil Toronto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> compresses quite well. Can Python import modules from encrypted ZIP
> files? That'd be an interesting way to protect a trade secret, and
> probably safer (in the courts) than distributing bytecode.
An import hook would do it.
- Josiah
___
On 12/4/06, Neil Toronto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Brett Cannon schrieb:
>
>> Did they say why they wanted to distribute bytecode files? I assume
it
>> is either for space considerations or they think it will help to
protect
>> their IP somehow.
>>
>
> It's to protect
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Brett Cannon schrieb:
>
>> Did they say why they wanted to distribute bytecode files? I assume it
>> is either for space considerations or they think it will help to protect
>> their IP somehow.
>>
>
> It's to protect the IP (i.e. for proprietary software). They a
Brett Cannon schrieb:
> Some people (Robert Schweikert) requested byte-code stability at the
> LSB meeting: LSB should standardize a certain version of the byte code,
> and then future versions of Python should continue to support this
> byte code version.
>
>
> Did they say why
On 12/4/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some people (Robert Schweikert) requested byte-code stability at the
LSB meeting: LSB should standardize a certain version of the byte code,
and then future versions of Python should continue to support this
byte code version.
Did they
Some people (Robert Schweikert) requested byte-code stability at the
LSB meeting: LSB should standardize a certain version of the byte code,
and then future versions of Python should continue to support this
byte code version.
I explained that this is currently not supported, but would be
technica
