On Jun 15, 2006, at 10:29 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> Nicely done. It is fine by me if this goes in so we save a little
> space in the intern table.
Thanks for the good word. I've reworked the code a little bit and
fixed the comments. I don't have svn write access, so someone else
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
> This is very raw, but in the spirit of "release early and often",
> here it is:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?
> group_id=5470&atid=305470&file_id=181807&aid=1507011
>
> On Jun 15, 2006, at 8:47 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
>>
>> I would be curi
This is very raw, but in the spirit of "release early and often",
here it is:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/download.php?
group_id=5470&atid=305470&file_id=181807&aid=1507011
On Jun 15, 2006, at 8:47 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> I would be curious to see your patch.
>
>
> Raymond
___
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>As an exercise in using the new set C API, I've replaced the
>"interned" dictionary in stringobject.c with a set. Surprisingly,
>what I thought would be a simple exercise, took several hours to
>implement and debug. Two problems are worth mentioning:
>
>1. I had to a
On 6/15/06, Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As an exercise in using the new set C API, I've replaced the
> "interned" dictionary in stringobject.c with a set.
>
> If there is any interest, I will submit a patch, but it does not seem
> to affect performance in any meaningful way.
As an exercise in using the new set C API, I've replaced the
"interned" dictionary in stringobject.c with a set. Surprisingly,
what I thought would be a simple exercise, took several hours to
implement and debug. Two problems are worth mentioning:
1. I had to add a function to setobject.h to ret
