On 01/23/2018 09:56 AM, Koos Zevenhoven wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:23 AM, Victor Stinner
mailto:victor.stin...@gmail.com>>wrote:
The PEP 555 looks a competitor PEP of the PEP 567. Since the Yury's
PEP 567 was approved, I understand that Koos's PEP 555 should be
rejected, no?
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:23 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> The PEP 555 looks a competitor PEP of the PEP 567. Since the Yury's
> PEP 567 was approved, I understand that Koos's PEP 555 should be
> rejected, no?
>
>
If Guido prefers to reject it​, I assume he'll say so. Anyway, it's still
waiting for
On 01/22/2018 03:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I am hereby *accepting* the latest version of PEP 567[1]. Congrats!
Congratulations, Yury!
--
~Ethan~
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-
The PEP 555 looks a competitor PEP of the PEP 567. Since the Yury's
PEP 567 was approved, I understand that Koos's PEP 555 should be
rejected, no?
Victor
2018-01-23 0:52 GMT+01:00 Guido van Rossum :
> Yury,
>
> I am hereby *accepting* the latest version of PEP 567[1]. Congrats!
>
> --Guido
>
> [1
Yay! Thank you, Guido!
Yury
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:52 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Yury,
>
> I am hereby *accepting* the latest version of PEP 567[1]. Congrats!
>
> --Guido
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/python/peps/commit/a459539920b9b8c8394ef61058e88a076ef8b133#diff-9d0ccdec754459da5f665cc6c
Yury,
I am hereby *accepting* the latest version of PEP 567[1]. Congrats!
--Guido
[1]
https://github.com/python/peps/commit/a459539920b9b8c8394ef61058e88a076ef8b133#diff-9d0ccdec754459da5f665cc6c6b2cc06
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> There has been useful and effec
There has been useful and effective discussion on several of the finer
points of PEP 567. I think we've arrived at a solid specification, where
every part of the design is well motivated. I plan to accept it on Monday,
unless someone brings up something significant that we've overlooked before
then
