Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-30 Thread Vinay Sajip
v.loewis.de> writes: > Now that we do have the PEP, I think that should be done properly. > I thought you offered to rewrite it. Formally, I could accept the > PEP being withdrawn, and the feature integrated anyway, but I still > consider that bad style. > > So: I can offer to rewrite the PEP t

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Brian Curtin
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 22:48, wrote: > Now that we do have the PEP, I think that should be done properly. > I thought you offered to rewrite it. There are definitely areas that I would like to work on, especially pulling implementation details out and replacing with, as you say, end-user prose.

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread martin
Zitat von Brian Curtin : After talking with Martin and several others during the language summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> 2012/3/29 Brian Curtin : >>> After talking with Martin and several others during the language >>> summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't >>> remember w

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Vinay Sajip
Brian Curtin python.org> writes: > Vinay - is the code you have on bitbucket ready to roll into CPython, > thus into the installer? I believe the main C launcher code is ready to roll into CPython. However, the standalone installer I provide uses WiX rather than msilib, and includes additional e

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin : > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson wrote: >> 2012/3/29 Brian Curtin : >>> After talking with Martin and several others during the language >>> summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't >>> remember who, but some suggested it sho

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Brian Curtin
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 18:08, Glenn Linderman wrote: > All it needs is official acceptance now, and integration into the release, > no? If it wasn't clear, this is what I said in the first post. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Glenn Linderman
On 3/29/2012 3:50 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2012/3/29 Brian Curtin: >> After talking with Martin and several others during the language >> summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't >> remember who, but som

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Brian Curtin
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 17:45, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2012/3/29 Brian Curtin : >> After talking with Martin and several others during the language >> summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't >> remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old >> fe

Re: [Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2012/3/29 Brian Curtin : > After talking with Martin and several others during the language > summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't > remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old > feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this

[Python-Dev] Integrating the PEP 397 launcher

2012-03-29 Thread Brian Curtin
After talking with Martin and several others during the language summit and elsewhere around PyCon, PEP 397 should be accepted. I don't remember who, but some suggested it should just be a regular old feature instead of going through the PEP process. So...does this even need to continue the PEP pro