On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 23:52 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I'd be happy to make some time to describe the XEmacs scheme and
> experience if somebody wants. However, XEmacs faces language and code
> organization constraints that Python does not, and Fredrik's
> suggestion looks like a substan
> "skip" == skip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
skip> BTW, there is one project I'm theoretically familiar with
skip> that attempts to handle the dual source situation: XEmacs.
skip> I'm still trying to come to terms with the practical issues
skip> involved. I'm supposed to be u
>> Just say "go", and I'll start working on this.
Jeremy> Are you still waiting for someone to say go? I'm not sure what
Jeremy> responsible party should say it; if I'm not the right person,
Jeremy> would the right person please say "go."
Can we take the absence of an explicit "
