Am 19.07.2010 04:22, schrieb Terry Reedy:
> On 7/18/2010 7:42 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
>> That phrasing implies that there is purpose behind letting issues rot.
>> Believe me that this is not the case.
>
> This seems like a good place to mention that doc issues have become a
> bright spot in th
> Interested, yes. But until either a) I can commit patches, or b) there
> is someone who will respond to commit review recommendations with "No,
> here is why not" or "Yes, committed", I will work on other issues, such
> as doc issues, for which I can get responses.
If you are then still interest
On 7/18/2010 7:42 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
That phrasing implies that there is purpose behind letting issues rot.
Believe me that this is not the case.
This seems like a good place to mention that doc issues have become a
bright spot in the last few years, with a couple of days turnaround not
Am 18.07.2010 00:45, schrieb Mark Lawrence:
> On 17/07/2010 22:57, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 7/17/2010 8:41 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>> IIRC Terry Reedy is also interested in moving IDLE forward.
>>
>> Interested, yes. But until either a) I can commit patches, or b) there
>> is someone who will
On 17/07/2010 22:57, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/17/2010 8:41 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
IIRC Terry Reedy is also interested in moving IDLE forward.
Interested, yes. But until either a) I can commit patches, or b) there
is someone who will respond to commit review recommendations with "No,
here is
On 7/17/2010 8:41 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
IIRC Terry Reedy is also interested in moving IDLE forward.
Interested, yes. But until either a) I can commit patches, or b) there
is someone who will respond to commit review recommendations with "No,
here is why not" or "Yes, committed", I will wo
On 17/07/2010 12:50, Michael Foord wrote:
On 17/07/2010 12:47, Steve Holden wrote:
On 7/17/2010 7:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:05:22 +0300
Tal Einat wrote:
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
I have been using IDLE since 2002 and hav
On 17/07/2010 12:47, Steve Holden wrote:
On 7/17/2010 7:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:05:22 +0300
Tal Einat wrote:
I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
I have been using IDLE since 2002 and have been doing my best to help
mai
On 7/17/2010 7:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 02:05:22 +0300
> Tal Einat wrote:
>>
>> I would like to propose removing IDLE from the standard library.
>>
>> I have been using IDLE since 2002 and have been doing my best to help
>> maintain and further develop IDLE
