On 4/2/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Fredrik, if you would like to help move this all forward, great; I
> > > would appreciate the help. You can write a page scraper to get the
> > > data out of SF
> >
> > challenge accepted ;-)
> >
Woohoo!
> > http://effbot.python-hosting.c
> > Fredrik, if you would like to help move this all forward, great; I
> > would appreciate the help. You can write a page scraper to get the
> > data out of SF
>
> challenge accepted ;-)
>
> http://effbot.python-hosting.com/browser/stuff/sandbox/sourceforge/
>
> contains three basic tools; getind
Robert Kern wrote:
> FWIW: Trac has a Sourceforge bug tracker import script:
>
> http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/browser/trunk/contrib/sourceforge2trac.py
>
> Apologies: for the other blank reply.
That isn't actually worth that much: somebody would need to operate it,
too. Mere existence doesn
On 3/30/06, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > Same here. Please move any more comments about infrastructure to the
> > infrastructure list
> > (http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure/). But
> > do realize the committee is not discussing trackers
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On 3/28/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>My view is that nothing should be "considered" unless there is
>>a) a volunteer to operate the tracker (or, failing that, somebody who
>> does it for money), and
>>b) an importer of whatever data SF can provide.
>
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > > I can ask them for a test py3k account, if there's any interest.
> >
> > I'm personally not very much interested in a Py3k tracker; I don't
> > see myself using it. So I'm not interested in a trac-based one,
> > either.
>
> Me neither. It's too early.
I wasn't really
Brett Cannon wrote:
> On 3/28/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>>Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)?
>>
>>Richard Jones has an SF importer for one of the two XML-like formats,
>>the one that is correct XML but with incomplete data. The oth
Brett Cannon wrote:
> Same here. Please move any more comments about infrastructure to the
> infrastructure list
> (http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure/). But
> do realize the committee is not discussing trackers yet. We are still
> trying to get our SF data out so that can
On 3/28/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)?
>
> Richard Jones has an SF importer for one of the two XML-like formats,
> the one that is correct XML but with incomplete data. The other format,
> which has compl
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)?
>
> Richard Jones has an SF importer for one of the two XML-like formats,
> the one that is correct XML but with incomplete data. The other format,
> which has complete data but is ill-formed XML,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)?
Richard Jones has an SF importer for one of the two XML-like formats,
the one that is correct XML but with incomplete data. The other format,
which has complete data but is ill-formed XML, has no importer into
roundup at th
Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 28 March 2006 19:13, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> > Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable,
> > maintained and used succesfully by large open source projects (like
> > GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpath).
>
> Please god no. No
Op di, 28-03-2006 te 09:23 -0600, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Based on my brief experience as a Bugzilla user (just trying to be a good
> citizen and report Mozilla bugs a few years ago), I would vote -1. I'd hate
> to think the bug reporting interface was *so* bad that it alone would
> discourag
Barry> The infrastructure committee (of which I'm a member but not the
Barry> chair) is examining the alternatives and trying to put up some
Barry> live demos for people to check out.
Roundup is there now, right (sans SF export)? Trac is being used by the
folks doing the new websit
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 10:13 +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable, maintained
> and used succesfully by large open source projects (like
> GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpath).
The infrastructure committee (of which I'm a member but not the chair)
On 3/28/06, Wolfgang Langner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what about trac:http://www.edgewall.com/trac/It is based on python and has a very good svn integration.Sorry, I should have realized more than half of python-dev lacked the context in which I made my suggestion. At PyCon and in a few other se
Wolfgang Langner wrote:
> what about trac:
>
> http://www.edgewall.com/trac/
>
> It is based on python and has a very good svn integration.
We started using it recently and so far it's working really well. I love
the svn (and wiki!) integration. However, I have no idea how well it
scales to a p
Anthony Baxter wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 March 2006 19:35, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>> Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable,
>> >> maintained and used succesfully by large open source projects
>> >> (like GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpa
Hello,
what about trac:
http://www.edgewall.com/trac/
It is based on python and has a very good svn integration.
--
bye by Wolfgang
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 19:35, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable,
> >> maintained and used succesfully by large open source projects
> >> (like GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpath).
> >
> > Please god no.
Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable,
>> maintained and used succesfully by large open source projects (like
>> GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpath).
>
> Please god no. No bugzilla, no no no. Please!
Care to elaborate?
--
Giovanni
On Tuesday 28 March 2006 19:13, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Another option would be Bugzilla, which is proven to be stable,
> maintained and used succesfully by large open source projects (like
> GCC+RedHat+Binutils+Classpath).
Please god no. No bugzilla, no no no. Please!
Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ah, glad to hear I wasn't the only one bitten by that. For a while, I
>> thought I was going senile :-P Speaking of which, perhaps we should
>> designate the running roundup instance on python.org as the issuetracker
>> for py3k ? Gives us a good chance
23 matches
Mail list logo
