On 3/25/07, Mike Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From your proposal:
>
> > 2) In all modules, Follow the new RFC 2396 in favour of RFC 1738 and RFC
> > 1808.
>
> The "new" RFC 2396 was superseded by STD 66 (RFC 3986) two years ago. Your
> failure to notice this development doesn't bode well :)
On 3/24/07, Josiah Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I were to summarize your proposal, it would be "merge, clean up, and
> add features to urllib, urllib2, and urlparse". Sounds reasonable for
> Python 3, but remember that you will need to update any standard library
> module that current
Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> I have written a proposal to cleanup urllib as part of Google SoC. I am
> attaching the file 'soc1' with this email. Requesting you to go through the
> proposal and provide any feedback which I can incorporate in my submission.
>From your proposal:
> 2) In all modules, Fo
The original went through. You likely didn't get any responses because
the proposal has text that is significantly longer than most other SoC
proposals, and perhaps people just haven't had the time to read it yet.
Also, I don't believe anyone else has posted the full text of their
proposal publi
Resending this; as i think my sf.net email alias got blocked by the python-dev.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Senthil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mar 24, 2007 6:05 AM
Subject: RFC - GoogleSOC proposal -cleanupurllib
To: python-dev@python.org
Hi All,
I have written a proposal to c
