Am 18.08.2010 20:59, schrieb "Martin v. Löwis":
> Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord:
>> Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python
>> 2.7 as stable?
>
> I think the answer is "no, it could not".
>
> How many old documentation sets would you want to go through
On 18/08/2010 21:59, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord:
Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python
2.7 as stable?
I think the answer is "no, it could not".
How many old documentation sets would you want to go through, and
Am 18.08.2010 17:11, schrieb Michael Foord:
> Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python
> 2.7 as stable?
I think the answer is "no, it could not".
How many old documentation sets would you want to go through, and
regenerate them? There is also
http://docs.python.org
Could (and should) the online Python 3.1 docs be updated to show Python
2.7 as stable?
All the best,
Michael
Original Message
Subject:Old link text in documentation
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:49:34 -0700
From: Aaron DeVore
To: webmas...@python.org
The link
