At 11:27 AM 6/10/2007 +0100, Gustavo Carneiro wrote:
> I have to agree with you. If removing support for
> self.__dict__['propertyname'] (where propertyname is also the name
> of a descriptor) is the price to pay for significant speedup, so be
> it. People doing that are asking for trouble a
At 04:14 AM 6/10/2007 +0300, Eyal Lotem wrote:
>On 6/10/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At 12:23 AM 6/10/2007 +0300, Eyal Lotem wrote:
> > >A. It will break code that uses instance.__dict__['var'] directly,
> > >when 'var' exists as a property with a __set__ in the class. I believ
I have to agree with you. If removing support for
self.__dict__['propertyname'] (where propertyname is also the name of a
descriptor) is the price to pay for significant speedup, so be it. People
doing that are asking for trouble anyway!
On 10/06/07, Eyal Lotem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On
On 6/10/07, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:23 AM 6/10/2007 +0300, Eyal Lotem wrote:
> >A. It will break code that uses instance.__dict__['var'] directly,
> >when 'var' exists as a property with a __set__ in the class. I believe
> >this is not significant.
> >B. It will simplify g
