Guido van Rossum wrote:
The underscore at the beginning of _sre clearly indicates that the module is
not recommended for direct consumption, IMO. Even the functions that don't
themselves start with an underscore...
I've written a re-code verifier for the Google App Engine
... which means tha
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:53:18PM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>> The underscore at the beginning of _sre clearly indicates that the module
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:41 AM, A.M. Kuchling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:53:18PM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>> The underscore at the beginning of _sre clearly indicates that the module is
>> not recommended for direct consumption, IMO. Even the functions that don't
yOn Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 03:53:18PM +, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> The underscore at the beginning of _sre clearly indicates that the module is
> not recommended for direct consumption, IMO. Even the functions that don't
> themselves start with an underscore...
Sure, but if someone is trying to
Victor Stinner haypocalc.com> writes:
>
> Le Monday 21 July 2008 15:33:19 A.M. Kuchling, vous avez écrit :
> > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:45:39PM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > > Hum... how can I say it? It's trivial to crash _sre So I blacklisted
> > > _sre.compile() in my fuzzer.
> >
> > We
Le Monday 21 July 2008 15:33:19 A.M. Kuchling, vous avez écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:45:39PM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Hum... how can I say it? It's trivial to crash _sre :-) So I blacklisted
> > _sre.compile() in my fuzzer.
>
> We should certainly try to fix those issues, then; peo
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:45:39PM +0200, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hum... how can I say it? It's trivial to crash _sre :-) So I blacklisted
> _sre.compile() in my fuzzer.
We should certainly try to fix those issues, then; people usually
assume the re module is safe for use inside a sandbox and pro
On 2008-07-20 22:45, Victor Stinner wrote:
Le Saturday 19 July 2008 21:52:09 A.M. Kuchling, vous avez écrit :
Excellent work! Another fruitful area for fuzzing might be the
miniature virtual machine used by the re module. It's possible to
import _sre and call the compile() function directly (s
Victor Stinner wrote:
Le Saturday 19 July 2008 21:52:09 A.M. Kuchling, vous avez écrit :
Excellent work! Another fruitful area for fuzzing might be the
miniature virtual machine used by the re module. It's possible to
import _sre and call the compile() function directly (see the end of
Lib/sre
Le Saturday 19 July 2008 21:52:09 A.M. Kuchling, vous avez écrit :
> Excellent work! Another fruitful area for fuzzing might be the
> miniature virtual machine used by the re module. It's possible to
> import _sre and call the compile() function directly (see the end of
> Lib/sre_compile.py for h
Hi,
Le Saturday 19 July 2008 15:14:44, vous avez écrit :
> Thank you Victor - I didn't want to change any underlying
> multiprocessing code until we had the test suite in a better state
> (which we do now) (...)
>
> One suggestion would be to include tests to prove the bugs is fixed if
> possible
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Victor Stinner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I filled 14 issues about bugs found by fuzzing (see my other email "Play with
> fuzzing" for more informations). Most bugs are now closed, cool :-) Last
> bugs:
>
>
> == Trivial open bugs ==
>
> segfault on locale.
Hi,
I filled 14 issues about bugs found by fuzzing (see my other email "Play with
fuzzing" for more informations). Most bugs are now closed, cool :-) Last
bugs:
== Trivial open bugs ==
segfault on locale.gettext(None)
- http://bugs.python.org/issue3302
- attached patch is trivial: fix the PyA
13 matches
Mail list logo