On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a while back there was a discussion about new operators for the language,
> which
> ended in people mentioning that the status of PEP 225 was still undecided and
> that it was the most likely route to consider in this dis
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:01 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> a while back there was a discussion about new operators for the language,
> which
> ended in people mentioning that the status of PEP 225 was still undecided and
> that it was the most likely route to consider
Hi all,
a while back there was a discussion about new operators for the language, which
ended in people mentioning that the status of PEP 225 was still undecided and
that it was the most likely route to consider in this discussion. I offered
to collect some feedback from the numerical and math/sc
