Wiadomość napisana przez Martin v. Löwis w dniu 2011-06-01, o godz. 08:48:
>> Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
>>> While we're at it, adding a "recursive" argument to this shutil.chown
>>> could also be useful.
>>
>> I don't like the idea of a recursive fl
> Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
>> While we're at it, adding a "recursive" argument to this shutil.chown
>> could also be useful.
>
> I don't like the idea of a recursive flag.
I think shutil.chown should aim to mimic chown(1). At least GNU chown
has a -
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 15:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:41:46 -0400
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> I think it would be a nice feature, and I can see the conflict. OT1H you
>> want
>> to keep os.chown() a thin wrapper, but OTOH you'd rather not have to add a
>> new, arguably more
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> 2011/5/26 Charles-François Natali :
> > Then, I wonder why shutil.copytree and shutil.rmtree are provided.
> > Recursive rm/copy/chown/chmod are extremely useful in system
> > administration scripts. Furthermore, it's not as simple as it seems
> > because of symlinks, see for
2011/5/26 Charles-François Natali :
> Then, I wonder why shutil.copytree and shutil.rmtree are provided.
> Recursive rm/copy/chown/chmod are extremely useful in system
> administration scripts. Furthermore, it's not as simple as it seems
> because of symlinks, see for example http://bugs.python.org
2011/5/26 Victor Stinner
> Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
> > While we're at it, adding a "recursive" argument to this shutil.chown
> > could also be useful.
>
> I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a "map-like"
> function to "apply"
>> While we're at it, adding a "recursive" argument to this shutil.chown
>> could also be useful.
>
> I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a "map-like"
> function to "apply" a function on all files of a directory. Something
> like shutil.apply_recursive(shutil.chown)...
>
I wa
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
> > While we're at it, adding a "recursive" argument to this shutil.chown
> > could also be useful.
>
> I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a "map-like"
> function to "apply" a fu
On 5/25/2011 1:17 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
>> While we're at it, adding a "recursive" argument to this shutil.chown
>> could also be useful.
>
> I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a "map-like"
> func
Le mercredi 25 mai 2011 à 18:46 +0200, Charles-François Natali a écrit :
> While we're at it, adding a "recursive" argument to this shutil.chown
> could also be useful.
I don't like the idea of a recursive flag. I would prefer a "map-like"
function to "apply" a function on all files of a directory
While we're at it, adding a "recursive" argument to this shutil.chown
could also be useful.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-de
On May 25, 2011, at 04:15 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>Right. Please add a mention of shutil.chown() to the os.chown() docs, though.
Brilliant!
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://ma
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 15:41, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I think it would be a nice feature, and I can see the conflict. OT1H you want
> to keep os.chown() a thin wrapper, but OTOH you'd rather not have to add a
> new, arguably more difficult to discover, function. Given those two choices,
> I still
On Wed, 25 May 2011 09:41:46 -0400
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 25, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> >before opening an issue to track the request, I'd like to ask advice
> >here about this: extend os.chown() to accept even user/group names
> >instead of just uid and gid.
> >
> >On a Un
On May 25, 2011, at 10:24 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>before opening an issue to track the request, I'd like to ask advice
>here about this: extend os.chown() to accept even user/group names
>instead of just uid and gid.
>
>On a Unix system, you can call chown command passing either id or
>names, so i
Hi all,
before opening an issue to track the request, I'd like to ask advice
here about this: extend os.chown() to accept even user/group names
instead of just uid and gid.
On a Unix system, you can call chown command passing either id or
names, so it seems (to me at least) natural to expect os.ch
16 matches
Mail list logo
