Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I was aware of Guido's earlier rejections, but I figured the rejection
> was due to the risky implicit optimization proposed by others. Perhaps
> the objection is deeper than that; I suspect Guido specifically objects
> to excessive use of recursion.
As I recall, one of t
Adam Olsen wrote:
> Since they're not going to be accepted into python anyway, the
> implementation is off-topic for python-dev. Please take them up
> elsewhere (such as my offer to discuss in private.)
I was aware of Guido's earlier rejections, but I figured the rejection
was due to the risky im
On 10/12/07, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> > Shane Hathaway wrote:
> >> I'm interested in seeing a good way to write tail calls in Python. Some
> >> algorithms are more readable when expressed using tail recursion.
> >
> > About ten seconds after I wrote the p
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> I'm interested in seeing a good way to write tail calls in Python. Some
>> algorithms are more readable when expressed using tail recursion.
>
> About ten seconds after I wrote the previous message, I realized two things:
>
> - It's easy to write
On 10/12/07, Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm interested in seeing a good way to write tail calls in Python. Some
> algorithms are more readable when expressed using tail recursion.
>
> I know tail call optimization has been discussed before [1], but I would
> like to con
Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I'm interested in seeing a good way to write tail calls in Python. Some
> algorithms are more readable when expressed using tail recursion.
About ten seconds after I wrote the previous message, I realized two things:
- It's easy to write "return Return" instead of "raise
Hello,
I'm interested in seeing a good way to write tail calls in Python. Some
algorithms are more readable when expressed using tail recursion.
I know tail call optimization has been discussed before [1], but I would
like to consider a different approach. The previous discussion centered
on im
