Tim Peters wrote:
> Sorry, but it's horridly un-doctest-like to make inferences by magic.
> If you want to add an explicit ACCEPT_EXCEPTION_SUBCLASS doctest
> option, that's a different story. I would question the need, since
> I've never got close to needing it, and never heard anyone else bring
[Tim]
>> ...
>> doctest strives to be magic-free WYSIWYG. If someone _intends_
>> the module name to be optional in a doctest, they should explicitly
>> use doctest's ELLIPSIS option.
[Nick Coghlan]
> There's already a little bit of magic in the way doctest handles exceptions. I
> always use doct
