Re: [Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-03-01 Thread Patrick Maupin
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Daniel Fetchinson wrote: > Quick question: if JSON is too hard to manually edit, how can RSON be > any easier when it is a *superset* of JSON? > Well, Python is essentially a superset of JSON, with string escape handling being ever so slightly different, and usin

Re: [Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-03-01 Thread Daniel Fetchinson
> Finding .ini configuration files too limiting, JSON and XML to hard to > manually edit [snip] > I call the new format RSON (for "Readable Serial Object Notation"), > and it is designed to be a superset of JSON. Quick question: if JSON is too hard to manually edit, how can RSON be any easier wh

Re: [Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-02-28 Thread Patrick Maupin
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Well, a constructive approach would involve approaching projects > which have devised their own formats, so as to know what kind of > unified format they would be likely to accept (or not). Trying to poll "selected projects which have confi

Re: [Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-02-28 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:46:30 -0600, Patrick Maupin a écrit : > > I suppose I have that sort of reaction about areas I am not interested > in, as well, but currently I am deeply interested in configuration > files due to my circumstances. In any case, the observation that > there are already seve

Re: [Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-02-28 Thread Patrick Maupin
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:39 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > In this case it is *at best* python-ideas material, or even > preferably comp.lang.python. I was thinking about comp.lang.python at some point, but thought I would try here first. > Just for the record, my only reaction when giving the PE

Re: [Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-02-28 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Le Sun, 28 Feb 2010 18:59:16 -0600, Patrick Maupin a écrit : > > So, I do not mind the code sitting outside the standard library, and > the PEP not reaching "Final" for several years, but I do believe that > the PEP process is itself a really good way to build a better > mousetrap by consensus.

Re: [Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-02-28 Thread Patrick Maupin
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote: > In that case, it should live in the user space for several years. If > the community decides that it is an excellent format, then it should > be considered for inclusion in the stand library. Agreed. However, there are too many things w

Re: [Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-02-28 Thread Benjamin Peterson
2010/2/28 Patrick Maupin : > All: > > Finding .ini configuration files too limiting, JSON and XML to hard to > manually edit, and YAML too complex to parse quickly, I have started > work on a new configuration file parser. In that case, it should live in the user space for several years. If the co

[Python-Dev] Draft PEP on RSON configuration file format

2010-02-28 Thread Patrick Maupin
All: Finding .ini configuration files too limiting, JSON and XML to hard to manually edit, and YAML too complex to parse quickly, I have started work on a new configuration file parser. I call the new format RSON (for "Readable Serial Object Notation"), and it is designed to be a superset of JSON