On 5/30/05, Brett C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Facundo Batista wrote:
> > Going on with the old bugs checking, here are the results for 2.2.2 (and
> > one from 2.2.1). When I'll finish this will be put in an informational PEP.
> >
>
> Great work, Facundo! Now I feel lazy. =)
C'mon! Just a w
Facundo Batista wrote:
> Going on with the old bugs checking, here are the results for 2.2.2 (and
> one from 2.2.1). When I'll finish this will be put in an informational PEP.
>
Great work, Facundo! Now I feel lazy. =)
-Brett
___
Python-Dev mailing l
Going on with the old bugs checking, here are the results for 2.2.2 (and
one from 2.2.1). When I'll finish this will be put in an informational PEP.
When I verified the bug, I filled two fields:
- Summary: the same subject as in SF
- Group: the bug's group at verifying time.
- Bug #: the bug numb
Title: Deprecating old bugs
As I discussed in this list, in the "Policy about old Python versions" thread at 8-Nov-2004, I started verifying the old bugs.
Here are the results for 2.1.*. This maybe should be put in an informational PEP.
When I verified the bug, I filled two fields:
- Grou