Jim> Would it make sense to add an attic (or even "deprecated")
Jim> directory to the end of sys.path, and move old modules there? This
Jim> would make the search for non-deprecated modules a bit faster, and
Jim> would make it easier to verify that new code isn't depending
Jim
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:21:34 -0600, Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jim> Would it make sense to add an attic (or even "deprecated")
> Jim> directory to the end of sys.path, and move old modules there? This
> Jim> would make the search for non-deprecated modules a bit fas
> It was also agreed that deleting deprecated modules was not needed; it breaks
> code and disk space is cheap.
> It seems that no longer listing documentation and adding a deprecation
> warning
> is what is needed to properly deprecate a module. By no longer listing
> documentation new progr
