On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 22:17 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> Does everybody feel comfortable with 'stage' and 'resultion' fields in
> tracker?
>
> I understand that 'stage' defines workflow and 'resolution' is status
> indicator, but the question is - do we really need to separate them?
> For ex
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 14:17, anatoly techtonik wrote:
> The resolution will likely be 'fixed' which doesn't give any info
> about if the patch was actually committed or not.
If there's no commit update in the messages on the issue, you should
assume it was not committed. At that point, either i
Does everybody feel comfortable with 'stage' and 'resultion' fields in tracker?
I understand that 'stage' defines workflow and 'resolution' is status
indicator, but the question is - do we really need to separate them?
For example, right now when a ticket's 'status' is closed (all right -
there is