I think that would be a better use of your time than continuing to refine
the spec of your competing proposal.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Mike Miller
wrote:
> That could be helpful and done without too much work, adding in the best
> practices and PEP8 guidelines that have been asked for i
That could be helpful and done without too much work, adding in the best
practices and PEP8 guidelines that have been asked for in other threads.
Are people interested in a "rationale and best practices" for string
interpolation pep?
-Mike
On 09/04/2015 08:15 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Th
On 09/04/2015 08:15 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
The text of the PEP has too much on motivation and rationale: maybe that would
be suitable for an informative PEP. The proposal itself is under-specified.
But the real weakness cannot be fixed by improving the text: it is in the key…
I'm plannin
The text of the PEP has too much on motivation and rationale: maybe that
would be suitable for an informative PEP.
The proposal itself is under-specified.
But the real weakness cannot be fixed by improving the text: it is in the
key characteristic of the proposal, which wants to have its cake and
