Neal Norwitz wrote:
>> For codeobject.c, line 327 should not be reachable.
...
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Please suppress the warning. I removed the last
> two lines and GCC complained ...
Either way, it would be worth adding a comment to the source code so
this doesn't come up again.
-jJ
___
On Jan 10, 2008 8:01 AM, Joseph Armbruster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not a developer but i'm interested in browsing it. Is it
> possible to be added?
Yes, I've added you to the list. I'll probably send the list off
tomorrow, so let me know if you would like to be added.
n
--
>
>
> On Ja
I am not a developer but i'm interested in browsing it. Is it
possible to be added?
On Jan 10, 2008 10:57 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neal Norwitz wrote:
> > I think only Coverity can add people. You can send them a message if
> > you would like to be added: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> I think only Coverity can add people. You can send them a message if
> you would like to be added: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or you can send
> mail to me and I can forward along all the people that would like to
> be added.
>
> I'll wait a few days to collect names so I can batch u
Neal Norwitz wrote:
> For traceback.c, namebuf defined on line 155 should be moved out one
> block since filename is an alias to namebuf and it is used outside the
> current scope. I think this is unlikely to be a problem in practice,
> but is technically wrong and should be fixed.
Agreed, the ea
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> For mmapmodule.c, fd should be checked for -1 before calling stat on line
> 1064.
On looking at this, it doesn't seem like an actual problem. fstat(-1,
...) returns a -1 and errno is set to EBADF, 'bad file descriptor'.
/*
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:11:21PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> For mmapmodule.c, fd should be checked for -1 before calling stat on line
> 1064.
I'll fix the mmap problem.
--amk
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/
On Jan 9, 2008 9:08 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I went to the run2 page:
>
> http://scan.coverity.com/rung2.html
>
> I shows 6 uninspected defects for Python. How do we see what they are?
> What is an uninspected defect? Any idea how the Coverity folks compute
> Defects/KLOC? For exa
On Jan 9, 2008 9:08 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Christian> I read the announcement of the Python Users list and figured
> Christian> out that some of the other core developers might be
> Christian> interested in the news, too.
>
> Christian> Among other projects Python was u
On Jan 9, 2008 1:12 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Heller wrote:
> > Seems they are referring to the results of the rung 1 run (what ever 'rung'
> > means ;-).
> > With the account Neal made me some months ago, I can login on this page:
> >
> >http://scan.coverity.com
Christian Heimes schrieb:
> Thomas Heller wrote:
>> Seems they are referring to the results of the rung 1 run (what ever 'rung'
>> means ;-).
>> With the account Neal made me some months ago, I can login on this page:
>>
>>http://scan.coverity.com:7475/
>>
>> and see the scan results for Pyt
Thomas Heller wrote:
> Seems they are referring to the results of the rung 1 run (what ever 'rung'
> means ;-).
> With the account Neal made me some months ago, I can login on this page:
>
>http://scan.coverity.com:7475/
>
> and see the scan results for Python.
>
> Last run at 2007-12-27: 1
Guido van Rossum schrieb:
> On Jan 9, 2008 9:47 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I shows 6 uninspected defects for Python. How do we see what they are?
>> > What is an uninspected defect? Any idea how the Coverity folks compute
>> > Defects/KLOC? For
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Christian> I read the announcement of the Python Users list and figured
> Christian> out that some of the other core developers might be
> Christian> interested in the news, too.
>
> Christian> Among other projects Python was upgraded to Rung 2 on the
>
On Jan 9, 2008 9:47 AM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I shows 6 uninspected defects for Python. How do we see what they are?
> > What is an uninspected defect? Any idea how the Coverity folks compute
> > Defects/KLOC? For example, how does tcl manage to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shows 6 uninspected defects for Python. How do we see what they are?
> What is an uninspected defect? Any idea how the Coverity folks compute
> Defects/KLOC? For example, how does tcl manage to get a 0.0 score?
I can't answer your question. I don't have access to the
Christian> I read the announcement of the Python Users list and figured
Christian> out that some of the other core developers might be
Christian> interested in the news, too.
Christian> Among other projects Python was upgraded to Rung 2 on the
Christian> Coverity Scan list: ht
Christian Heimes wrote:
> Joseph Armbruster wrote:
>> Christian,
>>
>> Is there any way you (or someone else) could post up the results? It
>> looks like you need a log in to check them out.
>
> I haven't figured out how to access the results.
>
> Who has a login and access to the site?
I know
Joseph Armbruster wrote:
> Christian,
>
> Is there any way you (or someone else) could post up the results? It
> looks like you need a log in to check them out.
I haven't figured out how to access the results.
Who has a login and access to the site?
Christian
_
I read the announcement of the Python Users list and figured out that
some of the other core developers might be interested in the news, too.
Among other projects Python was upgraded to Rung 2 on the Coverity Scan
list: http://scan.coverity.com/
Christian
20 matches
Mail list logo
