Is there any thought to extending escape to escape / unescape to by
default handle characters other than <, >, and &? At a minimum it
should handle arbitrary &xxx; values. Ideally, it would also handle
common other symbolic names besides < > etc.
HTML from common web sites such as nytimes.c
At 11:56 PM -0400 5/10/08, Fred Drake wrote:
>On May 10, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Works for me. The other thing I always use from cgi is escape() --
>> will that be available somewhere else too?
>
>
>xml.sax.saxutils.escape() would be an appropriate replacement, though
>the loc
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 06:39:02PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
>>> cgi.escape() to the html package somewhere (either 'html',
>>> 'html.parser'
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Oleg Broytmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 06:39:02PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> cgi.escape() to the html package somewhere (either 'html',
>> 'html.parser' which is currently HTMLParser, or some new module;
>
> html.parser.escape() see
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 06:39:02PM -0700, Brett Cannon wrote:
> cgi.escape() to the html package somewhere (either 'html',
> 'html.parser' which is currently HTMLParser, or some new module;
html.parser.escape() seems a bit backward; html.escape() fits the best!
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:34 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Fred Drake schrieb:
On May 10, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Guido
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Fred Drake schrieb:
>>>
>>> On May 10, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Works for me. The other thing I always use from cgi
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fred Drake schrieb:
>>
>> On May 10, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>>
>>> Works for me. The other thing I always use from cgi is escape() --
>>> will that be available somewhere else too?
>>
>>
>> xml.sax.saxu
-Brett [from his iPod touch]
On 10-May-08, at 20:49, "Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Works for me. The other thing I always use from cgi is escape() --
will that be available somewhere else too?
It can be. =)
-Brett
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL P
Fred Drake schrieb:
On May 10, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Works for me. The other thing I always use from cgi is escape() --
will that be available somewhere else too?
xml.sax.saxutils.escape() would be an appropriate replacement, though
the location is a little funky.
Ide
On May 10, 2008, at 11:49 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Works for me. The other thing I always use from cgi is escape() --
will that be available somewhere else too?
xml.sax.saxutils.escape() would be an appropriate replacement, though
the location is a little funky.
-Fred
--
Fred Drake
Works for me. The other thing I always use from cgi is escape() --
will that be available somewhere else too?
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just realized that PEP 3108 was missing one proposal from the stdlib
> SIG (originally proposed by Facundo Bati
I just realized that PEP 3108 was missing one proposal from the stdlib
SIG (originally proposed by Facundo Batista) of copying the
cgi.parse_qs() function over to the new urllib.parse module so that
people no longer need to import the cgi module just for that one
parsing function. Does anyone objec
16 matches
Mail list logo
