Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2013-12-13 Thread Kingmody
‏‫من جهاز الـ iPad الخاص بي‬___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2013-12-13 Thread Kingmody
‏‫من جهاز الـ iPad الخاص بي‬___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2013-12-13 Thread Kingmody
‏‫من جهاز الـ iPad الخاص بي‬___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-21 Thread Guido van Rossum
I've approved the latest version of this PEP. Congrats, Antoine! --Guido On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Hello, > > I haven't seen any strong objections, so I would like to go ahead and > commit PEP 3155 (*) soon. Is anyone against it? > > (*) "Qualified name for clas

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-19 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 03:31:09 +0100 Victor Stinner wrote: > > I haven't seen any strong objections, so I would like to go ahead and > > commit PEP 3155 (*) soon. Is anyone against it? > > I'm not against it, but I have some questions. > > Does you a working implementing? I suppose the question i

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > 19.11.11 01:54, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): >> >> Well, the other propositions still seem worse to me. "Qualified" is >> reasonably accurate, and "qualname" is fairly short and convenient (I >> would hate to type "__qualifiedname__" or "__

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-18 Thread Serhiy Storchaka
19.11.11 01:54, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): Well, the other propositions still seem worse to me. "Qualified" is reasonably accurate, and "qualname" is fairly short and convenient (I would hate to type "__qualifiedname__" or "__qualified_name__" in full). In the same vein, we have __repr__ which m

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-18 Thread Victor Stinner
I haven't seen any strong objections, so I would like to go ahead and commit PEP 3155 (*) soon. Is anyone against it? I'm not against it, but I have some questions. Does you a working implementing? Do you have a patch for issue #9276 using __qualname__? Maybe not a fully working patch, but a

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 19, 2011, at 12:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >I've added explanations for these two points. Do they satisfy your >expectations? Yep, thanks. -Barry ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-18 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:15:28 -0500 Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Nov 18, 2011, at 09:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > >I haven't seen any strong objections, so I would like to go ahead and > >commit PEP 3155 (*) soon. Is anyone against it? > > > >(*) "Qualified name for classes and functions" > >h

Re: [Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-18 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Nov 18, 2011, at 09:14 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >I haven't seen any strong objections, so I would like to go ahead and >commit PEP 3155 (*) soon. Is anyone against it? > >(*) "Qualified name for classes and functions" >http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3155/ I'm still not crazy about the

[Python-Dev] Committing PEP 3155

2011-11-18 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello, I haven't seen any strong objections, so I would like to go ahead and commit PEP 3155 (*) soon. Is anyone against it? (*) "Qualified name for classes and functions" http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3155/ Thank you Antoine. ___ Python-D