On 1/12/07, Facundo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>
> > I thinking that the 3.0.X version be considered a try it out (alpha)
> > release to
> > generate plenty of feed back, and the 3.1.X version be the first version
> > meant
> > for actual development use.
>
> +1 for this
Ron Adam wrote:
> I thinking that the 3.0.X version be considered a try it out (alpha) release
> to
> generate plenty of feed back, and the 3.1.X version be the first version
> meant
> for actual development use.
+1 for this approach.
I think it's very clear, and everybody will understand it
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Also, I'm wondering if the desire for 2.6 warnings is based on the notion that
> it will be possible to get large tools to work under both Py2.x and Py3.x.
I had certainly assumed it would be possible.
In fact, I had assumed that the 2->3 translator would have a mode
w
