2016-12-16 11:24 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou :
> Since you are cleaning up, you could remove the whole "PROPOSAL: A
> Generic Python Object Interface for Python C Modules" introduction,
> which isn't very interesting to read today.
Done: hg.python.org/cpython/rev/3ab0a6692e25
Victor
Many eons ago, Jim created abstract.h. The proposal comment (which you're
right to be cutting out now) was his and at some point it was accepted, but
I just copied-pasted the whole text into abstract.h. So yes, please keep
the "many thanks to Jim Fulton" in there!
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:03 AM,
2016-12-16 11:24 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou :
> Since you are cleaning up, you could remove the whole "PROPOSAL: A
> Generic Python Object Interface for Python C Modules" introduction,
> which isn't very interesting to read today.
Ah right, I noticed this huge comment but I didn't understand the
pur
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 11:22:10 +0100
Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> Before:
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/f692dafe6797/Include/abstract.h
>
> Now:
> https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/c4bcca326c0a/Include/abstract.h
Since you are cleaning up, you could remove the whole "PROPOSAL: A
Generic Pyth
I think it looks better. Thank you.
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 02:22, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I made multiple changes to the Include/abstract.h header file, because
> it was inconsistent in different manners:
>
> * Parameter names of functions of the PyObject_Call family were
> inconsisten
Hi,
I made multiple changes to the Include/abstract.h header file, because
it was inconsistent in different manners:
* Parameter names of functions of the PyObject_Call family were
inconsistent: "func" versus "callable" for a Python callable object
for example (sometimes, .c and .h files were inc
