Le jeudi 11 mars 2010 21:58:11, Brett Cannon a écrit :
> > (...)
> > Should I backport the fix to 3.1? (The backport to py3k is not done yet)
>
> Once you are happy with the stability then please port it to 3.1.
My commit broke test_sysconfig, test_platform and test_subprocess. Some
commits late
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 13:33, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2010/3/11 Brett Cannon :
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 17:21, Victor Stinner <
> victor.stin...@haypocalc.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Some news about my patch.
> >>
> >> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a
2010/3/11 Brett Cannon :
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 17:21, Victor Stinner
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some news about my patch.
>>
>> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit :
>> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum
>> > wrote:
>> > > Actually it sounds like ther
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 17:21, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some news about my patch.
>
> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit :
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum
> wrote:
> > > Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause
> > > so
Hi,
Some news about my patch.
Le lundi 08 mars 2010 19:21:20, Maciej Fijalkowski a écrit :
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause
> > somewhere that should be adjusted to catch just "Exception" instead of
>
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 22:06:36, vous avez écrit :
>> OTOH I think the try/except in site.py around the execution of
>> sitecustomize.py might be changed so that it prints a full traceback
>> whenever it raises an exception other than ImportEr
Le lundi 08 mars 2010 22:06:36, vous avez écrit :
> OTOH I think the try/except in site.py around the execution of
> sitecustomize.py might be changed so that it prints a full traceback
> whenever it raises an exception other than ImportError or, again,
> exceptions inheriting from BaseException bu
Le lundi 08 mars 2010 22:18:34, Glyph Lefkowitz a écrit :
> On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I am trying to remember why I made site.py failures non-fatal in the
> > first place. I don't have any specific recollection but it must've
> > been either from before the separation
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> I am trying to remember why I made site.py failures non-fatal in the
> first place. I don't have any specific recollection but it must've
> been either from before the separation betw
On Mar 8, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I am trying to remember why I made site.py failures non-fatal in the
> first place. I don't have any specific recollection but it must've
> been either from before the separation between site.py (part of the
> stdlib) and sitecustomize.py (sit
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> Le lundi 08 mars 2010 18:47:18, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
>> Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause
>> somewhere that should be adjusted to catch just "Exception" instead of
>> "*".
>
> Most of my patches (for SIG
Hi,
Le lundi 08 mars 2010 18:47:18, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause
> somewhere that should be adjusted to catch just "Exception" instead of
> "*".
Most of my patches (for SIGINT) are exactly doing that: check the exception
type inst
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause
>> somewhere that should be adjusted to catch just "Exception" instead of
>> "*".
>>
>
> There is at least one
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause
> somewhere that should be adjusted to catch just "Exception" instead of
> "*".
>
There is at least one that prints "import 'site' failed" and continues
to run your program
Actually it sounds like there's some overly general except clause
somewhere that should be adjusted to catch just "Exception" instead of
"*".
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 13:12, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wrote patches for the issue #3137 and I
On 08/03/2010 13:12, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
I wrote patches for the issue #3137 and I would like your opinion about my
solution (not directly about the patches): I propose to consider a SIGINT
during startup as a fatal error. If you press CTRL+c while Python is starting,
Python displays an er
Hi,
I wrote patches for the issue #3137 and I would like your opinion about my
solution (not directly about the patches): I propose to consider a SIGINT
during startup as a fatal error. If you press CTRL+c while Python is starting,
Python displays an error and exit with the code 1.
Currently,
17 matches
Mail list logo