On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 19:40, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>> So, to start with, is there a maintainer for the json module, or how
>> should I go about discussing implementing this solution?
>
> Your subject states that there is an actual bug in t
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 19:40, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> So, to start with, is there a maintainer for the json module, or how
> should I go about discussing implementing this solution?
Your subject states that there is an actual bug in the json module,
but your message fails to mention any actual bug
