On 12/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I then proposed the even wackier idea to simply allow all currently
> >> unsupported iterables (sets and arrays seem the most obvious
> >> candidates to me) to be marshalled as lists
>
> Raymond> Doesn't the appropriate
>> I then proposed the even wackier idea to simply allow all currently
>> unsupported iterables (sets and arrays seem the most obvious
>> candidates to me) to be marshalled as lists
Raymond> Doesn't the appropriate conversion depend on the contract
Raymond> between the sender
[Skip]
> I then proposed the
> even wackier idea to simply allow all currently unsupported iterables
> (sets
> and arrays seem the most obvious candidates to me) to be marshalled as
> lists
Doesn't the appropriate conversion depend on the contract between the
sender and receiver (i.e. an array of
During the bug day Andrew Kuchling (I think) mentioned that he was working
on some xmlrpclib issues. I then broached an idea I had a week or so ago to
allow sets to be marshalled as XML-RPC arrays. This was met with some head
scratching by those present. Forging ahead nonetheless, I then propos
