On 27 Jun 2014 17:33, "Bohuslav Kabrda" wrote:
>
> It's not true that 2.7 wasn't released until few weeks ago. It was
released few weeks ago as part of RHEL 7, but Red Hat has been shipping Red
Hat Software Collections (RHSCL) 1.0, that contain Python 2.7 and Python
3.3, for almost a year now [1]
- Original Message -
> While much of the opposition to dropping Python <2.7 stems from the RHEL
> community (they still have 2.4 in extended support and 2.7 wasn't in a
> release until a few weeks ago), a common objection from the users is "I
> can't install a different Python" or "it's too
Le 26/06/2014 22:00, Antonio Cavallo a écrit :
> Of course Anaconda is oriented towards scientific applications but it is
> a proof that a pre-build binary installer works and can be simple to
use.
Rpm are the "blessed" way to instal software on linux: it supports what
most sysadmin expect (ea
I have a little pet project for building rpm of python 2.7 (it should be
trivial to port to 3.x):
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:cavallo71:opt-python-modules
If there's enough interest I can help to integrate with python.org.
>> I understand there may be technical challenges wit
Le 26/06/2014 20:34, Gregory Szorc a écrit :
I'm an advocate of getting users and projects to move to modern Python
versions. I believe dropping support for end-of-lifed Python versions is
important for the health of the Python community. If you've done any
amount of Python 3 porting work, you kn
I'm an advocate of getting users and projects to move to modern Python
versions. I believe dropping support for end-of-lifed Python versions is
important for the health of the Python community. If you've done any
amount of Python 3 porting work, you know things get much harder the
more 2.x lega
