On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:43 AM, zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2008, at 13:58 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>>>
>>> P.S. Just in case it isn't clear: I would oppose any specific proposal
>>> to add this Ascii85 algorithm to the standard library.
On Aug 2, 2008, at 13:58 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
P.S. Just in case it isn't clear: I would oppose any specific
proposal
to add this Ascii85 algorithm to the standard library. It would sound
like we don't have any real problems to solve.
According to
Le samedi 02 août 2008 à 14:07 -0700, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is also used by git for diffs of binary files, and those diffs are
> > supposedly
> > understood by other VCSes like Mercurial...
>
> I'm very inter
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Antoine Pitrou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is also used by git for diffs of binary files, and those diffs are
> supposedly
> understood by other VCSes like Mercurial...
I'm very interested in this (for Rietveld). Where can I learn more
about how git handles di
Martin v. Löwis v.loewis.de> writes:
>
> P.S. Just in case it isn't clear: I would oppose any specific proposal
> to add this Ascii85 algorithm to the standard library. It would sound
> like we don't have any real problems to solve.
According to Wikipedia, "its main modern use is in Adobe's Post
